<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reflections in the Pond &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/tag/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog</link>
	<description>Adventures in needlework and other crafts from a cold Canadian momma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Guess They Liked the Movie Better</title>
		<link>http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/03/guess-they-liked-the-movie-better/</link>
		<comments>http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/03/guess-they-liked-the-movie-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Silverlotus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Outside World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/?p=898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s no secret that the world is going through a recession right now.  (Or at least the media tells us that an uncountable number of times a day.)  However, it appears that the movie-going public isn&#8217;t aware of this.  The &#8230; <a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/03/guess-they-liked-the-movie-better/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/03/guess-they-liked-the-movie-better/">Guess They Liked the Movie Better</a> is a post from <a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog">Reflections in the Pond</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>It&#8217;s no secret that the world is going through a recession right now.  (Or at least the media tells us that an uncountable number of times a day.)  However, it appears that the movie-going public isn&#8217;t aware of this.  The <a title="Filmgoers looking to laught off tough times" href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-fi-boxoffice2-2009mar02,0,2867634.story">Los Angles Times reports</a> that:</p>
<blockquote><p>Audiences seeking an escape have bolstered the industry&#8217;s U.S. box-office revenue to $1.8 billion this year, up more than 17% from the same period last year.</p></blockquote>
<p>The same day I heard this news, I read in the April 2009 issue of <em>The Writer</em> that the book publishing industry has been hit so hard that some publishers are even suspending new acquisitions (Leddy, Chuck. &#8220;Economy dampens publishing.&#8221; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Writer</span> Apr. 2009: 8-9.).  More <a title="HMH Places Temporary Halt on Acquisitions" href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6617241.html" class="broken_link">here</a> from Publisher&#8217;s Weekly.</p>
<p>So, to get this straight, people will pay $10US or  more (over $15CAN) to watch an hour and a half long movie that is probably only so-so, instead of spending $9.99 or less on a paperback book that will last them a week or more and (horror of horrors!) allows them to use their imagination.  Amazing.</p>
<p>Go out and buy a book.  Keep writers in business.  Read to your kids.  Buy them books.  Literacy is important.</p>
<p>This is a message from your friendly, neighbourhood bookworm.  Now maybe I should go put in an order to <a href="http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/">Chapters</a>&#8230;  Any recommendations?</p>
<p><a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/03/guess-they-liked-the-movie-better/">Guess They Liked the Movie Better</a> is a post from <a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog">Reflections in the Pond</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-898"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/03/guess-they-liked-the-movie-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cashmere for Grasslands</title>
		<link>http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/01/cashmere-for-grasslands/</link>
		<comments>http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/01/cashmere-for-grasslands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Silverlotus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Outside World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/?p=807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all want to wear nice things, and we all want to be able to afford what we want.  Although I have an allergy to animal fibres, I can understand the draw of a lovely, soft cashmere or qiviut sweater.  &#8230; <a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/01/cashmere-for-grasslands/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/01/cashmere-for-grasslands/">Cashmere for Grasslands</a> is a post from <a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog">Reflections in the Pond</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>We all want to wear nice things, and we all want to be able to afford what we want.  Although I have an allergy to animal fibres, I can understand the draw of a lovely, soft cashmere or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qiviut">qiviut</a> sweater.  Changes in manufacturing, consumer demand and such have made once expensive items very affordable.  Orchids now cost about $20, and a cashmere sweater can be had for under $100.  But what sort of effect is this having?  In the case of cashmere, surely there has to be more goats out there now to provide all the fibre required.</p>
<p>The Seattle Times ran in article back in December 2006 about just such a thing: <a href="http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20061228&amp;slug=cashmere282">That low-priced cashmere sweater has a hidden cost</a>.  The U.S. imports 15 times as many sweaters today as it did a decade ago, and the goats needed to provide the fibre are destroying China&#8217;s grasslands.  This is allowing the Gobi Desert to expand at an alarming rate, and leads to masive dust storms that have an effect on air pollution as far away as North American.  All this because we want some cheap sweaters.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see this as a problem with China, or a problem with the U.S.  I think it is more something that has grown out of our current culture of entitlement.  We think cashmere sweaters are nice, we deserve nice things because we work hard/had a rough day/had a crappy childhood/whatever your excuse is.  So, we go to the store and demand that the items we want, things that were once luxury items, are sold at a price we can (just) afford.  There is no thought about how the increased demand is effecting the world, we just want our reward for being us.  And you know what, I&#8217;m totally guilty of this.  I know I do it.  I have a $15 orchid sitting on the dinning room table that I bought because I was feeling a little down one day when the Baby Man was acting up.  Goodness only knows what is happening in the world to allow the prices of orchids to drop so much over the past several years.  I sure didn&#8217;t think about it when I bought it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another surprise for you: I don&#8217;t have a solution.  I&#8217;m not sure I even have any suggestions.  Maybe, though, I will think a bit more about what I buy, in terms of what I really need.  Do I need 15 pairs of socks?  Does the baby need yet another toy?  Will the world fall apart if we all shop a little less?  Maybe we will have a bit less, and maybe we will need to learn to live with less, but is it worth it if it keeps the planet running a little longer?  Jobs and goats vs. grasslands and clean air.  Today, that is a very difficult decision to make.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a bit of a related story about expensive suits, earrings and other things we don&#8217;t really need but exist anyway: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123275452531011647.html?mod=yhoofront">The $43,000 Recession Suit</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/01/cashmere-for-grasslands/">Cashmere for Grasslands</a> is a post from <a href="http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog">Reflections in the Pond</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-807"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lotuspond.silentblue.net/blog/2009/01/cashmere-for-grasslands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

